Wednesday, 12 October 2016

KULDEEP KOHLI - PETITION ARAVALI (MINES AND GEOLOGY)




KULDEEP KUMAR KOHLI
RZ 200B, STREET NO. 3, RAM CHOWK,
SADH NAGAR PART I, PALAM COLONY, NEW DELHI – 110045
Mobile: 08860332404
                    E MAIL: KULDEEP.KOHLI55@GMAIL.COM

12th October, 2016

Principal Secretary
Mines and Geology Department,
Government of Haryana,
30 Bays Building,
1st Floor, 17 – B, Haryana,
Chandigarh

Director General
Mines and Geology Department,
Government of Haryana,
30 Bays Building,
1st Floor, 17 – B, Haryana,
Chandigarh


SUBJECT: NO PERMISSION IS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF BOUNDARY WALL AND BUILDING TO BE USED FOR THE PURPOSES OF AGRICULTURE AT ANSALS ARAVALI RETREAT, VILLAGE RAISINA, TEHSIL SOHNA, GURGAON HENCE NO VIOLATION OF:

1.   Supreme court order in I.A. no. 12-13 of 2011 in Special leaves petition © No. 19628-19629 of 2009 in the matter of Deepak Kumar etc. Vs. State of Haryana and others.

2.   Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate Change Notification No. SO 141€ dated 15th January 2016.

3.   Haryana Government, Town & Country Planning Department Notification No. CCP(NCR)/DDP/BERI-2031/2014/10 dated 2nd January 2014
………………………………………………………………………………….

Dear Sir,

The Punjab Scheduled Roads and Controlled Areas Restriction of Unregulated Development Act, 1963 was enacted to prevent haphazard and substandard development along Scheduled Roads and in Controlled Areas in the State of Haryana.

The term agriculture” as per Section 2(1) of the Act ibid is defined as “agriculture includes horticulture, dairy farming, poultry farming and the planting and up keep of an orchard.”
It further reads:

Thus every person desiring to construct a building in the Controlled area has to get permission for change of land use (from agriculture to other purposes) from the Director.  However no such permission is necessary, if such building is used or is to be used for agriculture purposes or purposes subservient to agriculture.

As per provisions of Section 6 of the Act ibid, no personal shall erect or re-erect any building or make or extend any excavation or lay out any means of access to a road in a controlled area save in accordance with the plans and restrictions and conditions referred to in Sector 5 and with the previous permission of the Director.

Provided that no such permission shall be necessary for erection or re-erection of any building if such building is used or is to be used for agricultural purposes or purposes subservient to agriculture.

Notification No M 342/2013/8/1/2014-2TCP dated 14.1.2014 issued by the Principal Secretary to the Government of Haryana, Town & Country Planning, Haryana, Chandigarh also mentions non requirement of any type of NOC from the office of the Town & Country Planning. A copy of the notification is enclosed herewith for your ready reference. (Annexure 1)

Town & Country Planning Department, Haryana Government, Notification No CCP (NCR)/DDP/BERI-2031/2014/10 dated 2nd January 2014 under Annexure B reads at (zd) as under:

“Subservient to Agriculture” means development and activities which are required to assist in carrying out the process of agriculture such as tube wells, pump chambers, wind mills, irrigation drain, pucca platforms, fencing and boundary walls not more than 4 feet high and with maximum 3 feet fencing. A copy of the above mentioned notification is enclosed at (Annexure 2).

Hence this means that if you are desirous to construct a building and a boundary wall of four feet height and three feet fencing, then no permission is required if such building is used or is to be used for agriculture purposes or purposes subservient to agriculture. 

The Honourable Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 10717 of 2014 (arising out SLP © No. 33002 of 2010) has ordered no to royalty on excavated earth for laying foundation. The Supreme Court has held that the government is not entitled to any mining royalty if a developer excavates land for laying foundation of a building, thus rejecting the Maharashtra government’s claim that the activity of digging up earth for any such concrete foundation is akin to mining operations.

Deciding a batch of appeals led by the Promoters and Builders Association of Pune, a bench headed by Justice Ranjan Gogoi partly set aside the Bombay High Court order which held that even ordinary earth was to be treated as a (minor) mineral and the state government had the right to all minerals on public or private land.

While it held that the ordinary earth used for filling or levelling purposes in construction of embankments, roads, railways, buildings is deemed to be a minor mineral, the excavation of ordinary earth by the developers for laying foundation of buildings or for the purpose of widening of the channel to bring adequate quantity of sea water for the purpose of cooling the nuclear plant would not amount to a mining activity so as to attract any levy of royalty or penalty.

“A blanket determination of liability merely because ordinary earth was dug up, therefore, would not be justified; what would be required is a more precise determination of the end use of the excavated earth; a finding on the correctness of the stand of the builders that the extracted earth was not used commercially but was redeployed in the building operations,” Justice Gogoi said.

The Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 defines mining operation under Chapter 3 as under: Annexure 3.
(d) “Mining operations" means any operations undertaken for the purpose of winning any mineral;

Mines and Geology Department Notification on the 20th June, 2012 No G.S.R.No /C.A.67/57/S.15/2012 by the Government of Haryana defines Mining Operation under Chapter 2 as under:   (Copy Enclosed as Annexure 4)

(xxviii) ‗” Mining operations” means any operation carried out for the purpose of winning any mineral except mineral oils;

6. Exemptions in certain cases (Copy enclosed as Annexure 5)

(2) In other cases:

(i) Construction of any building by the public or private sector, or road or any other development project under the authority of any government department or its agencies involving any digging or excavation for a purpose other than winning a mineral:

Provided that where any minor mineral comprising construction sand and stone is excavated and extracted in the process of execution of such projects, the same shall be disposed off or consumed only after obtaining a permit from the Mines and Geology Department and payment of the applicable royalty and other fees as prescribed under rule 32.

"Winning" does not imply a hazardous or perilous activity. The word simply means "extracting a mineral" and is used generally to indicate any activity by which a mineral is secured. "Extracting", in turn, means drawing out or obtaining. A tooth is 'extracted' as much as it fruit juice and as much as a mineral. Only, that the effort varies from tooth to tooth, from fruit to fruit and from mineral to mineral.

Ministry of Environment, Forest and Climate change notification dated New Delhi, the 15th January, 2016 under appendix – ix , [see paragraph 7(i) (b)] provides the details on exemption of certain cases from requirement of environmental clearance under item no. 9 and reads as under: ( Copy enclosed as Annexure 6) Digging of foundation for buildings not requiring prior environmental clearance

This means that those buildings which do not require prior environmental clearance are exempted from the provisions of the above notifications.

we wish to inform you that we are aware of the fact that mining of stone in Haryana without the necessary permission from the concerned Departments of the Central and the State Government is illegal and so is buying of the illegal mined stone illegal. Hence we advise all our members to buy the stone from the queries in Rajasthan and obtain a receipt at the Octroi Post for such stone being used in their farm houses when the stone is entering the borders of Haryana.

We would now like to seek your views on our understanding being correct on the issues and the notifications mentioned above. 

An early communication would relieve the farm owners of unwanted anxiety and stress being caused because of so many notifications and different interpretations being conveyed by the officers.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully,

  
Kuldeep Kumar Kohli


Copy to:

State Mining Officer
Mines and Geology Department,
Government of Haryana,
30 Bays Building,
1st Floor, 17 – B, Haryana,
Chandigarh

State Geologist
Mines and Geology Department,
Government of Haryana,
30 Bays Building,
1st Floor, 17 – B, Haryana,
Chandigarh

Mining Engineer
Mines and Geology Department,
Government of Haryana,
30 Bays Building,
1st Floor, 17 – B, Haryana,
Chandigarh

Assistant Mining Engineer
Mines and Geology Department,
Government of Haryana,
IDC, Plot no. 2, Mehrauli Road,
Gurgaon,
Haryana

Mining Inspector
Mines and Geology Department,
Government of Haryana,
IDC, Plot no. 2, Mehrauli Road,
Gurgaon,
Haryana


Friday, 30 September 2016

KULDEEP KOHLI - PETITION ARAVALI DC ADVICE ALL


KULDEEP KUMAR KOHLI
RZ 200B, STREET NO. 3, RAM CHOWK,
SADH NAGAR PART I, PALAM COLONY, NEW DELHI – 110045
Mobile: 08860332404
                    E MAIL: KULDEEP.KOHLI55@GMAIL.COM

AR/DC/01

29.09. 2016

Deputy Commissioner
District Gurgaon,
1ST Floor, Mini Secretariat,
Gurgaon,
Haryana


Request to advice all concerned at the time of “Determination of the revenue estate of Raisina and Gairatpur Bas as per the orders of Honourable High Court of Punjab & Haryana”.

Dear Sir,

The Raisina Aravali Retreat Resident Welfare Association hereinafter referred to as RARRWA, a duly registered body under the Haryana Registration and Regulation of Societies Act, 2012 is an Association of the owners of the farm houses at Ansals Aravali Retreat, Village Raisina, Tehsil Sohna, District Gurgaon, representing the interest of most of the farm land owners.  The Raisina Aravali Retreat has total farm 675, out of which 218 are of 2 Acre and 457 are of 1 Acre.
This entire property as per the existing records falls in Village Raisina and not Village Gairatpur Bas.

Sir, Gairatpur Bas village has been filing cases for many years claiming that lot of area of Ansals Aravali Retreat belongs to Gram Panchayat, Gairatpur Bas but the fact is that the Honourable Courts have never agreed to their requests and have always turned down their petitions.

This issue has been raised earlier in the different Honourable Courts and I am enclosing herewith few recent judgements settling this issue with specific instructions. 

We wish to draw your specific kind attention to the judgement of Honourable Shri J Surya Kant of the High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh in the civil writ petition No. 5603 of 2015 in the matter of M/s Delhi Towers & Estates Pvt. Ltd. versus of State of Haryana & others.  The said writ petition was disposed with the following directions.

“The Deputy Commissioner, Gurgaon is directed to constitute a team comprising:

(i)          District Revenue Officer, Gurgaon or Senior Most Tehsildar of Gurgaon District.

(ii)        Block Development and Panchayat Officer of the Block in which both the villages fall.

(iii)   Consolidation officer from the Department of Consolidation.

(iv)      Field Kanungo.

(v)        Forest range Officer.

(vi)      Patwaries of both the villages along with complete revenue records.

The above stated team shall firstly, after going through the entire revenue and consolidation records, determine the total revenue estate of each village, if already not determined, after comparing the pre and post consolidation numbers.

Thereafter the revenue boundaries of both the villages shall be determined/ demarcated at the site.

The location of the land purchased by the petitioner shall be measured and demarcated at the spot to find out whether it exclusively falls within the revenue estate of village Raisina or it overlaps the revenue estate of village Gairatpur Bas.

The petitioner as well as Gram Panchayats of villages Raisina and Gairatpur shall be associated at all stages while conducting the above stated proceedings.

If need be, the assistance of retired revenue officials who are well conversant with the area may also be obtained.

On completion of the above stated exercise, if it is found that that the petitioners have encroached upon any area within the revenue estates of village Gairatpur Bas which vests in the Gram Panchayat of that village, they shall have to vacate such area at their own within three months, falling which the Gram Panchayat shall be at liberty to initiate proceedings under Section 7 of the 1961 Act.”

A copy of the last order of the Honourable High Court of Punjab & Haryana at Chandigarh 19.9.2015 is enclosed herewith – Annexure II).  I am also enclosing herewith the following additional documents for your kind information on the issue so that the matter is closed for ever.

    i.     The order of the Assistant Collector cum SDO, Gurgaon South dated 25.4.2016 based on the order of the Honourable High Court of Punjab & Haryana, at Chandigarh as Annexure - Annexure III wherein he has reiterated the order of the Honourable High Court of Punjab & Haryana.

   ii.        A copy of the Affidavit filed by the Respected Deputy Commissioner as Annexure IV wherein he is confirming through an Affidavit before the Honourable Court of Punjab and Haryana that the land pertaining to Ansals Aravali Retreat wherein my farm is situated is has been purchased in Village Raisina and not Village Gairatpur Bas.

Sir, as you are aware the core issue raised in these cases is whether the land purchased by the petitioner falls within the revenue estate of village Raisina, Tehsil Sohna, District Gurgaon or it falls within the revenue estate of village Gairatpur Bas of the same sub division?  If the first question is answered in affirmative and the subject land is held within the revenue of estate of village Gairatpur Bas and not Raisina, yet another question that required determination would be whether such land was owned by the vendors from whom the petitioner had purchased it and does it vest in the Gram Panchayat?.

It is obvious that the demarcation and dimensions of the parcels of land purchased by the petitioners are also required to be determined and carried out so as to resolve the dispute between them and the Gram Panchayat of village Gairatpur Bas.

Respected Sir, the issues involved in this matter can have huge repercussions on the holding of innocent farm house purchaser who bought this property almost 25 years back and that is the reason for the Honourable Court ordering such a systematic process to be followed for demarcation of the property.

We have been given to understand that some newly elected members of Governing Body of Gairatpur Bas Panchayat are once again claiming that some area of the above Ansal Aravali Retreat belongs to their village where as the fact is that the Honourable High Court of Punjab and Haryana has already ordered the guidelines to be followed for consolidation and determination of the revenue estate.

Respected Sir, in view of above, kindly advice all concerned authorities to follow the guidelines laid by the Honourable High Court of Punjab and Haryana in determination of the revenue estate of Raisina and Gairatpur Bas and any act by any of the revenue authorities and the Town and Country Planning in violation of the guidelines laid by the Honourable High Court of Punjab and Haryana would tantamount to contempt of the orders of court.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully

KULDEEP KUMAR KOHLI

Copy to:

District Town Planner
Enforcement,
Department of Town and Country Planning,
HUDA Complex,
Sector – 14, Gurgaon

Tehsildar
Sohna,
District Gurgaon,
Haryana


Sunday, 25 September 2016

KULDEEP KOHLI- PETITION ANSAL ILLEGAL AND ARBITRARY AGREEMENT




KULDEEP KUMAR KOHLI
RZ 200B, STREET NO. 3, RAM CHOWK,
SADH NAGAR PART I, PALAM COLONY, NEW DELHI – 110045
Mobile: 08860332404
                    E MAIL: KULDEEP.KOHLI55@GMAIL.COM
             

24.9.2016

Shri Vinod Saigal
Director,
Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Limited,
11th Floor, Ansal Bhawan,
16, Kasturba Gandhi Marg,
New Delhi – 110011


Respected Shri Vinod Saigal Ji:

SUBJECT: NOTHING MORE THAN 15% (WITHOUT THE INTEREST) SHOULD BE PAID AGAINST THE DUES OF THE
MAINTENANCE AGENCIES

This has reference to the discussions our representative Mr. Kuldeep Kumar Kohli had with you in connection with reference to the old dues pertaining to the maintenance agency.

We thank you for confirming that nothing more than 15% should be paid to the maintenance agency with regard to the dues accruing to the individual farms. Moreover, this 15% is to be calculated on the actual amount due without the  interest component and this is applicable only till the time the agency was operating at Ansals Aravali Retreat.
You have kindly agreed to this recognising the fact that no money has been spent on the maintenance of Ansals Aravali Retreat and hence only 15% is a fair amount to cover the cost of staff salaries and sundry expenses.

In view of the discussions we had we are now advising our members of this offer of payment of 15% of the basic amount without interest.

We will also table this proposal in our General Body Meeting, scheduled for 25th September 2016 for information, views and approval of the farm owners.

We have been given to understand that the farms of many farm owners have not been transferred /registered in their name and are still in the name of Ansals. Ansals ask for a the complete payment of the maintenance charges  whenever the farm owners approach for registration of their farms.

We propose to inform the farm owners about this in our GBM and it is up to them to take it forward with you by paying 15% as agreed by you or less.

Thanking you,

Yours faithfully

KULDEEP KUMAR KOHLI



Saturday, 24 September 2016

KULDEEP KOHLI PETITION DC Re: ARAVALI



KULDEEP KUMAR KOHLI
RZ 200B, STREET NO. 3, RAM CHOWK,
SADH NAGAR PART I, PALAM COLONY, NEW DELHI – 110045
Mobile: 08860332404
                    E MAIL: KULDEEP.KOHLI55@GMAIL.COM
             

19.09.2016    

The Deputy Commissioner,
District Gurgaon,
First Floor,
Mini Secretariat,
Gurgaon


Request for non registration of  ILLEGAL SALE OF UNDIVIDED COMMON AREA, in Ansals Aravali retreat, VILLAGE RAISINA, TEHSIL SOHNA, DISTRICT GURGAON, HARYANA  by the developers m/s ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, 115, ANSAL BHAWAN, 16, KASTURBA GANDHI MARG , New Delhi AS PER DETAILS GIVEN HERE UNDER:

A. NIRMAL DYKE – A LAKE ON AN AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 3.6 ACRE TO SHRI NAVDEEP SINGH SOLD AS PLOT NO. E 54A

B. PART OF NURSERY AND SHEETAL KUNJ LAKE AN AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 2 ACRE TO SHRI BAWA KAPOOR SOLD AS PLOT NO. E 17 C

C. OFFICE OF AN AREA OF 1 ACRE TO SHRI KOCHHAR SOLD AS PLOT NO.E 19A



1.  THE  Raisina Aravali  Retreat Resident Welfare Association hereinafter referred to as RARRWA, a duly registered body under the Haryana Registration and Regulation of Societies Act, 2012  is  an Association of the owners of the farm houses at Ansals Aravali Retreat, Village Raisina, Tehsil Sohna, District Gurgaon, representing the interest of most of the farm land owners would like to bring to your notice illegal encroachment and sale of common land collectively belonging to the plot owners of the said Ansals Aravali Retreat.

2.  There has been a huge encroachment of the undivided common area, which appears to in connivance with the developer of the project M/s. Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Limited and its Directors and the officers connected with the project. 

3.  The major areas that have been encroached / or illegally sold include  are:
A. NIRMAL DYKE – A LAKE ON AN AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 3.6 ACRE TO SHRI NAVDEEP SINGH  SOLD AS PLOT NO. E 54A


b. PART OF NURSERY AND SHEETAL KUNJ LAKE AN AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 2 ACRE TO SHRI KAPOOR OR SOME ONE  KNOWN TO ANSALS SOLD AS PLOT NO. E 17 C
C. OFFICE OF AN AREA OF 1 ACRE TO SHRI KOCHHAR SOLD AS PLOT NO.E 19A

4.       I am herewith enclosing a copy of the brochure provided to all the buyers at the time of offering the property in 1989-1990 offering the following undivided common area:  (Annexure 1 & Annexure 2)

a. Drinking water with 14 tube wells already bored and more coming up
b. An overhead water tank with a capacity of 2,50,000 litres and  water pipe lines laid
c. A fishing fan
d. A dyke with a beautiful garden
e. Motorable Roads & Avenues – over 30 kms
f.  Electricity and telephone connections
g. Sheetal Kunj – a beautiful man made lake
h. Planters Club
i.  Children Park cum picnic spot
g. Health club with Sauna and Steam Bath
h. Playground and amusement park
i.  Swimming pool
j.  Mini Golf course
k. Tennis Courts
l.  Badminton Court
m. Squash Court
n. Library
o. Cards room
p. Billiards room
q. Video club
r.  Nursery approx. 2 acres
s.  An office in approx.. 1.25 acres
t.  Approx. one acre land near G 6 plot
u. Approx. one acre land near the entrance from the main road
    and many more facilities

5.   In our meetings with the officers of the m/s ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, 115, ANSAL BHAWAN, 16, KASTURBA GANDHI MARG , New Delhi, we have been given an unequivocal confirmation that the Lake, Nursery, and office space and other common areas mentioned above  are indeed common areas which belong collectively to the farm owners. 

6. We are enclosing herewith copies of a few communications addressed by us to the m/s ANSAL PROPERTIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE LIMITED, and their Senior Officers. After discussions with the senior officers they have repeatedly given us assurances that the developers would ensure and help us, with all possible means to that the undivided common area encroached, inter-alia,  by the people mentioned above, would be restored to the RARRWA  as the undivided common areas for use of the plot owners. (Annexure 3, 4, 5 and 6)

7. It may kindly be appreciated  that the undivided common area namely Nirmal Dyke, Sheetal Kunj the lake, Nursery, Office space , among others, etc.  were built by Ansals in the Ansal Aravali Retreat for the benefit of all owners and was a part of an offer luring the buyers to invest and buy the farm houses and constituted as part of the offer, and it being factored in the sale price, due to the cost of such infrastructure having been obtained from the owners by the builder, such infrastructure as mentioned above are owned as common property by all the owners of the Ansal Aravali Retreat. Therefore , it is both moral, and legal responsibility of the Ansal Properties and Infrastructure Limited towards the owners to ensure that the undivided common area is not sold by them as selling the same would be blatant abuse and criminal breach of such trust.

8. We are enclosing herewith the extracts from a Map prepared by Ansals Aravali Retreat prepared sometimes in 1990 which had been handed over by them to the office of the Town & Country Planning, Government of Haryana and which gives the details of all the plot owners but there is no mention of the plot numbers now illegally occupied by the people named above, which clearly means that these plots never existed at the time of the entire area being offered to the buyers and have now been created out of the undivided common area and sold illegally as claimed by the RARRWA  { people who claim to be owning to the said plots.} Annexure 7 & 8 )

PRAYER

9.  In view of what has been mentioned above we would request your kind indulgence in ensuring that the sale of the above plots are not registered by the office of the Tehsildar, Tehsil Sohna, District Gurgaon and Patwari, Tehsil Sohna, District Gurgaon and necessary directions   in this respect to all concerned authorities

10.  We would also request you to kindly initiate {take} legal action against the sellers and buyers of the above common areas and all those connived, conspired, aided and abetted in this unholy and illegal transactions {wrong doers if the property has been sold and also against those who have purchased the property as this properly never belonged to the seller ie.} including M/s Ansal Properties & Infrastructure Limited or its Officers or its Directors who have been a party in this illegal and unethical act in violation of its responsibility as the vendor developer .

11.  We would like to reiterate the areas stated above are common undivided areas for collective use and ownership of the plot owners, and would be happy to provide any additional information/evidence as may be required by the concerned authorities. We seek and beseech your intervention to protect the innocent, responsible, and law abiding plot owners, majority of whom are senior citizens, many of whom have served the government in responsible position and find it unpalatable to suffer gross injustice by ingenious, unethical and illegal perpetrators. 
  
Thanking you,

Yours faithfully

KULDEEP KUMAR KOHLI


Copy to:

Tehsildar,
Tehsil Sohna,
Gurgaon


Patwari,
Tehsil Sohna
Gurgaon