Rules 2(1)(o)(i) and 2(1)(o)(ii) of the rules are apparently inconsistent with section 3 of the Act.

 

For Informative and Educative Purposes Only

MUST READ

Rules 2(1)(o)(i) and 2(1)(o)(ii) of the rules are apparently inconsistent with section 3 of the Act. In the rules, the purview of ‘ongoing project’ has been restricted. It has been provided in explanation (i) of rule 2(1)(o) that those projects for which after completion of development works, an application under rule 16 of 1976 Rules (Haryana Development and Regulation of Urban Areas Rules, 1976) or under sub-code 4.10 of the Haryana Building Code was made to the competent authority on or before publication of the rules would not be ‘ongoing project’. Rules 2(1)(o)(ii) of the rules further provides that the ‘ongoing project’ does not include any part of any project for which part completion/completion, occupancy certificate or part thereof had been granted on or before publication of these rules. Rules 2(1)(o)(i) and 2(1)(o)(ii) are apparently inconsistent with section 3 of the Act.

      ADVOCATE KULDEEP KUMAR KOHLI

KOHLI AND KOHLI LAW ASSOCIATES

V-3/11, DLF PHASE III, GURUGRAM,

 HARYANA – 122002

Ph:01244014318,0124 4990107

Mail ID: contact@kohlilegal.com

WWW.KOHLILEGAL.COM